As we all know the UK economy suffered a huge 7.2% recessionÂ Q2-2008Â untilÂ Q3-2009. This was caused by Gordon Brown’s mismanagement of the economy. Aided and abetted by Ed Balls. His worst mistakes were profligate and inefficient government spending, even when the economy was booming, making a complete mess of financial services regulations, allowing a huge property price bubble and unbalancing the economy away from manufacturing. Labour tried to blame the banks, when it was not the banks’ fault. The BBC have taken up this lie as a mantra to be repeated whenever possible. The banks are the good guys, they contribute enormously to the British economy and helped dig it out of Gordon Brown’s immense black hole.
The incredible success of the banks improves the quality of life of everyone in Britain. In 2013 UK financial services had a trade surplus of Â£61bn, enough money to build 100 large hospitals. They paid a total of Â£65bn in tax, includingÂ corporation tax of Â£6.5bn andÂ employment taxes of Â£28.4bn. When you consider that the TOTAL income tax paid by EVERYONE in the UK is Â£160bn you can do some interesting maths. Basically without the tax paid by the financial services industry the rest of us would have to pay around 50% more income tax.
The bank â€œrescueâ€ orchestrated by Brown was abysmal. UnderÂ capitalism the shareholders and bondholders pay for a management failure. Under Brownâ€™s cronyism the state paid. A Scottish prime minister throwing (mainly) English taxpayerâ€™s money at Scottish banks to save Scottish jobs. Look at Washington Mutual to see how it should have been done, with assets valued at $327.9 billion, that went bust in 2008 with capitalism sorting out the mess.
Also worth noting is that the headline figure bandied around for the bail out is Â£500 billion. Another lie.Â The RBSÂ Group raised Â£5 billion in preference shares and Â£15 billion in ordinary shares.Â HBOS and Lloyds TSB together raised Â£17 billion, Â£8.5 billion in preference shares and Â£8.5 billion of ordinary shares.Â So Â£37 billion in total. An amount that was then a little over two weeks of the average spending for the UK government.
And Brown, far from solving the banking problem was actually instrumental in making it far worse. HeÂ vetoed Barclayâ€™s proposed rescue of Lehmanâ€™s. â€œWe donâ€™t want US problems infecting the UK systemâ€ the US government was told. Lehmanâ€™s went bust and contagion on both sides of the Atlantic was the result. Labour do not, never have and never will understand business or economics, if they did they wouldnâ€™t be socialists.
Ed Balls wasÂ Economic Secretary to the Treasury, fromÂ May 2006 tillÂ 27 Jun 2007 and had a major role in formulating Labour’s ridiculous economic policies that failed so badly.
Firstly let’s take a look at this academic paper, Extents and Limits of Monetary Reform under Gordon Brown. Here we find some interesting quotes:
“The 2008 crisis was that of credit. Credit had increased considerably in the preceding years: borrowers and lenders had relied on the growing housing prices to refinance their loans.”
“Accusations then multiplied against central banks for having maintained interest rates at too low a level and for too long a time after 11th September 2001.”
“So if Gordon Brownâ€™s monetary framework is not at fault, the causes of the credit crisis and the deep recession that followed must be found elsewhere. Massive research has already evidenced financial deregulation; expansionary budget policies and the accumulation of debt; restricted social policies not providing enough automatic stabilizers; and insufficient industrial policies.”
“The responsibility for the financial crisis and its economic outcomes rather lies in the other-than-monetary policies Gordon Brown implemented in the fields of financial regulation and budget management on the one hand, and in the development of the liquidity trap phenomenon on the other hand.”
Secondly there is this brief article, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Ed Balls’ Economic Legacy, written by an author of economic books. And there are more interesting quotes:
“The new Labour project was fundamentally flawed economically.
It failed to recognise the supply performance issues that challenge the UK economy and the way that many of the central problems arose out of a ratio of public spending that is too high in relation to national income. New Labour’s rhetoric and fiscal rules honed by Gordon Brown with the help of Ed Balls were a mask for a new Keynesian agenda.
Higher public expenditure and higher government borrowing dressed up in words such as prudenceÂ that pretended they were something else. The fiscal rules far from being an effective restraint on public spending and government borrowing accommodated any level of government spending and the creation of a significant budget deficit when the economy was operating at the peak of the economic cycle and over heating.Â NewÂ Labour’s huge increase in government spending aggravated the British economy’s long-term structural supply-side challenge at a time when it was about to become more difficult to manage as China, Indian and other emerging economies become more competitive. TheÂ spending, taxation and regulation of New Labour made the traded goods and services sectors and the manufacturing sector in particular less internationally competitive. As well as seriously aggravating these long-term structural supply performance problemsÂ Gordon Brown created the conditions forÂ the acute fiscal crisisÂ that Â is now overlaying these structural supply performance matters.”
“Today the New Labour economic legacy is a fiscal crisis, a public sector that is too large and an economy that has been consuming beyond its productive capacity. Public spending was planned and increased in the context of an unrealistic judgment about the UK economy long-term trend rate of growth.”
“The economy’s capacity to supply was damaged by New Labour’s spending and taxation before the credit crunch. Labour attempts to improve labour supply through education and training in many respects represented a miss-specification of the problem and hinderedÂ rather than helped. The slump in output has exposed Britain’s supply-side and fiscal problems and it hasÂ also further reduced the economy’s productive capacity. ”
You must be beginning to notice a trend here! So let’s look at a third article, this time from the Tax Payer’s Alliance, Some quotes:
“This poor growth performance is driven by an increasing burden of government spending, Britain falling behind in cutting corporate tax and increasing regulation and tax complexity. Britain slipped from having the 5 th lowest corporate tax rate in the OECD to the 10th highest, out of 30.”
“Spending on a range of public services has increased substantially but the results have been poor. The trend in falling mortality amenable to healthcare has not improved, Britain has fallen down international education rankings, recorded crime has increased and Britain has the lowest ratio of motorway network to the number of cars of any major European economy.”
“The tax burden has increased by 51 per cent in real terms since 1997-98 as tax rates have increased and the thresholds for many taxes have not been increased in line with inflation. Real disposable incomes increased by an average of 3.2 per cent each year before Gordon Brown became Chancellor but have gone up by just 2.6 per cent in each year since.”
As you can see, three consistent resources telling the same story. And one utterly different to the lies trotted out endlessly by the BBC/Labour Party/Trade Unions/Guardian.
It was Gordon Brown who trashed the British economy, aided and abetted by Ed Balls. The great recession was not the fault of the banks. If you believed that before you had been lied to. If you still believe it then you have a problem with the proven facts.
I totally agree with this statement, Brown was the worst thing that ever happened to this country. Balls and Miliband were at the Treasury making the decisions with Brown that crashed our economy. They must never be allowed back in to government, I can well remember every year Brown ending his Budget Statement with the words ‘NO MORE BOOM AND BUST’. What a joke, what a disaster and so many have such short memories. It is a disgrace that none of them have been held accountable.
I’m not going to even bother to waste my time pointing out the deep flaws in this relatively simple economic analysis. Just read this
Lefties are execrably bad at running the economy. This is proven by the empirical facts. There are always leftie academics who will tell lies, but they look very silly to anyone capable of critical thought.
a total pile of rightwing hogwash
You seem to have a problem with the facts. This is called cognitive dissonance.
http://www.nao.org.uk/highlights/taxpayer-support-for-uk-banks-faqs/ the article is daft. Uk government is debt because of the money to the banks.
“How much support did the Government provide to UK banks?
There were two types of support provided:
Provision of guarantees and other non-cash support. The main items under this heading are the Credit Guarantee Scheme, Special Liquidity Scheme and Asset Protection Scheme, as well as various other guarantees and indemnities provided to UK banks.
Provision of cash in the form of loans to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and insolvent banks to support deposits, and the purchase of share capital in Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group.
Peak support (Â£bn)
Guarantee commitments 1,029
Cash outlay 133
Total peak support 1,162
These figures set out our calculation of the total peak support provided to banks, including support that was made available but not used by a specific institution. They are calculated by adding all the support schemes together and removing overlaps.
The peak values have been taken from HM Treasury Annual Report and Accounts, Parliamentary supply estimates and NAO reports to Parliament. As each scheme and support facility was available at different times, the total peak support was not all available at a single point in time.”
Guest what we are in Â£1.5 trillion in debt now. I wonder where it came from duh lol
“support that was made available but not used”
Good article, though I’d like to mention something about all that tax the banks pay: the only reason why banks make so much profit to pay tax on is because they’ve created 97% of the money in circulation, in the form of debt, debt which they are charging interest on and this gives them an incredibly unfair advantage. The money they pay in tax is actually just the money the public are paying to the banks in interest but the banks are keeping a huge chunk of the interest. If the government took back full control of money creation the government would get all the interest therefore the budget deficit could be eliminated and even lower taxes too.
Arran. Thank you for your erudite comment. Why do so many commentators and economists ignore the basic issue of artificial money creation by the banks and the binge on debt which the West has enjoyed for 40 years…?!
You will enjoy this: https://www.bruceonpolitics.com/2016/07/22/economics-helicopter-drops/
I wish you’d referenced this. Having trouble second sourcing your claim that Barclays couldn’t buy Lehman brothers because Gordon Brown wouldn’t allow it.